Of course, no one claims to have arrived at perfection, and yet, Calvin says many do claim “to have yielded completely to God, [claiming that] they have kept the law in part and are, in respect to this part, righteous.”Only the terror of the Law can shake us of this self-confidence. Thus, the Law condemns and drives us to Christ, so that the Gospel can comfort without any threats or exhortations that might lead to doubt. ~Michael Horton
There’s been a fair amount of discussion of late among evangelical writers I read regarding the vital distinction between what I’ll refer to as the Law/Gospel distinction. Now, let me begin this post with a disclaimer: I’m a far cry from a theological scholar (and neither do I claim to be as much, which will come as no surprise to those who’ve followed my blog/writing the last few years). So, instead of pretending, I’ll lean on a respected theologian to do the heavy lifting in this post.
Personally speaking, it’s been since the days of big hair and parachute pants that I began to understand the great divide between works and grace (see Romans 11:6 below). It was like walking into a surgeons well-lit operating room after having been locked up in a dingy-dark dungeon for what felt like eons (I mention “works and grace” because it wasn’t until last few years I’ve become more familiar with the Law/Gospel distinction, credit goes to being casual student of Luther’s).
Michael Horton, who I quote above, has written and lectured extensively on the topic, and in a manner I think any layman with half a desire to wrap their brain around this whole idea will benefit from. Horton explains in a way that can be not only understood, but should be appreciated. In his book “Christless Christianity”, he writes (pages 124-125):
We need the law and the gospel, but each does different things. When we confuse law and gospel, we avoid both the trauma of God’s holiness and the liberating power of his grace. We begin to speak about living the gospel, doing the gospel, even being the gospel, as if the Good News were a message about us and our works instead of about Christ and his works. The proper response is neither to dispense with the law nor to soften it from demand to helpful advice. Rather, it is to recognize the difference between law and gospel. We are not called to live the gospel but to believe the gospel and to follow the law in view of God’s mercies. Turning the gospel into law is a very easy thing for us to do; it comes naturally. That is why we can never take the Good News for granted.
Any form of doing the gospel is a confusion of categories. The law tells us what to do; the gospel tells us what God has done for us in Christ. When it comes the question about how we relate to God, doing is the wrong answer. Paul explains, “Now to the one who works, his wages are not counted as a gift but as his due. And to the one who does not work but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness” (Rom. 4:4-5). It is not just some deeds on our part that are excluded here, but our works of any kind. “But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works; otherwise grace would no longer be grace” (Rom. 11:6).
…The law tells us what God expects of us; the gospel tells us what God has done for us.
So the law and the gospel are not inherently opposed, but when it comes to how we are saved, these two principles could not be more antithetical. And since our faith at every moment is threatened by our natural tendency to be distracted from its object—Christ—we need the gospel placarded before us not just at the beginning, but throughout the Christian life. The gospel is for Christians too. We need to be evangelized every week. It is not by following Christ’s example but by being inserted into Christ, clothed with Christ, united to Christ—as the Spirit creates faith through the gospel—we are not only justified but sanctified as well.
On the surface, the Law/Gospel distinction might not look important, but when you get down into the trenches of Christian living and faith, the ramifications couldn’t be any more gargantuan.
Thoughts?
For further reading see:
The Resurgence: “The Law & The Gospel” by Michael Horton
Tullian Tchividjian’s Blog: “Horton On The Law And The Gospel”
Tullian Tchividjian’s Blog: Interview With Mike Horton: Part One
Tullian Tchividjian’s Blog: Interview With Mike Horton: Part Two